Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
Rights and Access Note
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. Rights assessment remains the responsibility of the researcher. In addition, no permission is required from the rights-holder(s) for non-commercial uses.
Publication Date
12-19-2018
Issue Number
12
Volume Number
8
Abstract/ Summary
Measurements of optical properties have been used for decades to study particle distributions in the ocean. They are useful for estimating suspended mass concentration as well as particle-related properties such as size, composition, packing (particle porosity or density), and settling velocity. Measurements of optical properties are, however, biased, as certain particles, because of their size, composition, shape, or packing, contribute to a specific property more than others. Here, we study this issue both theoretically and practically, and we examine different optical properties collected simultaneously in a bottom boundary layer to highlight the utility of such measurements. We show that the biases we are likely to encounter using different optical properties can aid our studies of suspended sediment. In particular, we investigate inferences of settling velocity from vertical profiles of optical measurements, finding that the effects of aggregation dynamics can seldom be ignored.
Repository Citation
Boss, Emmanuel; Sherwood, Christopher R.; Hill, Paul; and Milligan, Tim, "Advantages and limitations to the use of optical measurements to study sediment properties" (2018). Marine Sciences Faculty Scholarship. 168.
https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/sms_facpub/168
Citation/Publisher Attribution
Boss, E., Sherwood, C.R., Hill, P., Milligan, T., 2018. Advantages and Limitations to the Use of Optical Measurements to Study Sediment Properties. Appl. Sci., 8, 2692.
Publisher Statement
© 2018 by the authors
DOI
10.3390/app8122692
Version
publisher's version of the published document