Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier
Rights and Access Note
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. In addition, no permission is required from the rights-holder(s) for educational uses. For other uses, you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
Publication Date
12-2012
Publisher location
Amsterdam, Netherlands
First Page
854
Last Page
862
Volume Number
51
Abstract/ Summary
In this paper, we discuss what might be termed an action-based learning approach to promoting important pro-environmental actions, such as support for or acceptance of environmental policy. Such an approach involves promoting simple and easy behaviours as entry points for more radical steps towards sustainability, referred to as “catalytic” or “wedge” behaviours. Despite the obvious need for innovative approaches to promote important pro-environmental behaviour, and sound theoretical backing for such concepts, there is a lack of research testing the key propositions of this approach. In a survey study based on a random sample of residents of the state of Maine, USA, we find that both everyday “green” behaviour and the acceptance of an expansion of wind power are rooted in environmental concern and that everyday “green” behaviour gives a significant contribution to predicting acceptance of wind power when controlling for environmental concern. Hence, the promotion of everyday “green” behaviours may prepare the grounds for increasing acceptance of more far-reaching changes in the population, such as an expansion of wind power.
Repository Citation
Noblet, Caroline L. and Thøgersen, John, "Does Green Consumerism Increase the Acceptance of Wind Power?" (2012). Publications. 83.
https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mitchellcenter_pubs/83
Citation/Publisher Attribution
Thagersen, J., & Noblet, C.L. 2012. Does Green Consumerism increase the acceptance of windpower? Energy Policy 51, 854-862
Publisher Statement
© 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
DOI
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.044
Version
post-print (i.e. final draft post-refereeing with all author corrections and edits)